Evercore Partners Inc (EVR)

Investment Committee Summary

Investment Thesis

Evercore is an independent investment banking advisory firm operating in the United States, Europe, Latin America and internationally. Revenue is transaction-contingent — fees earned on completed assignments — and the dominant cost is the compensation of the people who win them, which is why the operating margin sits near 24% rather than at the level a fee business might suggest. At $296 on 9 September 2026 the shares are fairly valued against the triangulated $327 (+11%) and the probability-weighted target of $333 also sits above the spot price, yet the stance stays neutral, which is the right response to a distribution this wide rather than a contradiction. One caveat on the framing: the engine routes the name through a brokerage and capital-markets driver set that includes client assets and interest on cash balances, and that fits a pure advisory firm only partly. The decisive variable is transaction activity, since a forward multiple near 17x is being applied to earnings whose position in the cycle is unknown. The most damaging risk is that the productive asset walks out: senior bankers are mobile, and earnings power can leave without a single client formally departing.

Narrative drafted 2026-08-16 by claude-opus-5 under supervision; reviewed by Marinus 2026-08-16.

The dashboard below is the whole argument on one page: spot ($296) against each valuation anchor, the scenario tree, technicals and the options-implied move.

Anti-Thesis (The Real Bear Case)

Advisory revenue is the most operationally geared line in financial services. When transaction windows close, fees do not decline gradually — assignments stop completing, and revenue can fall by a large fraction within a few quarters. Compensation is the theoretical offset, but in practice it is sticky: retaining senior producers through a downturn is exactly when the firm must pay, so the compensation ratio rises as revenue falls and the operating margin near 24% compresses faster than the top line. A forward multiple near 17x on cycle-flattered earnings then de-rates on top of the earnings decline. The structural path — a competitive and rate-driven reset in market activity — carries a fifth of the probability and resolves below the 52-week low. For a firm of this type the balance sheet is not the risk; the operating gearing in the income statement is.

Key Debate

P/E Multiple explains 89% of Monte Carlo outcome variance — i.e. value is set by the multiple the market will pay, a rate/sentiment regime bet as much as an earnings bet.

What the Market Is Pricing In

At the current price, the market pays 15.1× consensus forward EPS, vs the house DCF terminal 16.0×, and a peer median 10.4×. The house DCF sits 12% above spot, so the market is pricing in less than the house case — roughly 1.5pp of revenue CAGR.

Variant perception: the house view is below-consensus, and the thesis is primarily FCF-driven.

Scenario Analysis

The scenario tree spans a structural 'Structural — Zero-Commission / Rate / Competition Reset' downside ($146) to a 'Bull — Re-Rate' bull case ($589); the probability-weighted blend (PWEV $333) is +13% versus spot.

Share-count charge: none applied. The probability-weighted value above is the gross per-share figure — no annual dilution is deducted — stock-based compensation runs at 15% of revenue; free cash flow net of SBC is $0.51B. SBC is therefore disclosed, not charged: read the per-share figures as before dilution.

Scenario rationale — the driver path behind every target:

• Structural — Zero-Commission / Rate / Competition Reset (20%, $146). Structural impairment — fee compression / rate / competition reset: earnings AND the multiple compress together. Target sits below the 52-week low by construction.
• Market-Activity Recession (17%, $249). Cyclical downturn — client assets + transaction & advisory fee pool + net interest income weakens for 1–2 years before normalising.
• Base — Client Assets + NII + Trading (35%, $345). Mid-cycle — normalised client assets + transaction & advisory fee pool + net interest income; disciplined capital allocation; steady returns.
• Growth — Asset Gathering / Rate Tailwind (20%, $466). Upside — asset gathering + rate tailwind lifts earnings above mid-cycle; the multiple expands modestly.
• Bull — Re-Rate (8%, $589). Upside tail — sustained tight conditions or a structural re-rate on asset gathering + rate tailwind.

Valuation Triangulation

Three weighted anchors — an intrinsic dcf, a scenario-weighted pwev and a monte carlo median (student-t + regime switching) — read them with their basis in mind. The Monte Carlo, the DCF terminal and any peer re-rate key off a market multiple, so they are not fully independent; only discounted cash flows themselves are genuinely multiple-free. The discipline is to read the spread and weight the cash-based view, not to treat three numbers as three independent votes.

The house blend DECLARES five anchor weights — DCF 35%, scenario PWEV 25%, Monte Carlo 15%, sum-of-parts 15%, peer re-rate 10%. For this name sum-of-parts, peer P/E re-rate are not computed, so 25% of the declared weight is redistributed across the anchors that exist — which is why the weights above differ from the declared ones. The fair value is unaffected by this disclosure; the blend has always worked this way.

Peer EV/Revenue re-rate — 0% weight: it duplicates the peer-multiple information already carried by the Peer P/E anchor while ignoring margin mix; weighting both would double-count the peer view. Shown as a cross-check.

Monte Carlo — the outcome distribution

10,000 paths, Student-t shocks (fat tails) with a regime-switching overlay. The median lands at $312 and 56% of paths finish above spot. The variance decomposition shows the p/e multiple is the dominant swing factor (89% of variance). Value is a multiple bet: fundamentals move the answer far less than the rating does.

DCF — the cash-flow anchor

Independent of the market multiple: a 5-year path, WACC 9.0%, 16.0x terminal FCF multiple → $330. This anchor is deliberately the heaviest (47%): it is the valuation least hostage to the current multiple regime.

Peer benchmarking — relative value

Against the peer cohort, re-rating to the peer-median EV/Revenue multiple implies $209; the peer-median forward P/E is 10.4x, but the engine carries no P/E-implied price for this name (no forward-EPS basis at the peer step). A premium is only justified by superior growth/margins; otherwise it is multiple risk. Excluded from the weighted blend — shown only as a market cross-check.

Across all anchors the spread is 38% of the median — wide (genuine disagreement — the blend carries low valuation confidence).

Sensitivity

DCF/share — WACC × terminal multiple

DCF/share — revenue CAGR Δ × op-margin Δ

Tornado — DCF/share swing by driver (widest first)

Company lever — SoP/share vs Brokerage & Capital Markets multiple (AI re-rating) (base 19.0x)

Peer Quality & Weighting

Quality-weighted forward P/E: 13.4× (simple median 10.4×). Direct peers count 100%, segment 50%, broad 25%.

Historical-range cross-check: 52-week range $265–$387, centre $320 (+8% vs spot); spot sits at the 25th percentile of the range. Low-weight mean-reversion cross-check, not a fundamental anchor.

Risk / Reward & Margin of Safety

Reward/risk compares triangulated upside against the probability-weighted bear target, not the extreme tail. Bull case (Bull — Re-Rate): $589.

Company Overview & Business Model

Evercore Partners Inc — FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS. Evercore Inc., is an independent investment banking advisory firm in the United States, Europe, Latin America and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

How it makes money.

Edge. Narrow moat — inferred from a 24% operating margin and the brokerage & capital markets business model. Some pricing power / share stability; terminal multiple near the market.

Revenue-Segment Breakdown

The company-specific drivers behind the valuation — each segment carries its own growth, margin, multiple and capex intensity. (Tags: FACT reported · ESTIMATE from disclosures · INFERENCE judgment.)

Named Exposures

Demand & pricing cycle (FACT/ESTIMATE)

Capital intensity & shareholder returns (ESTIMATE)

Structural risk vs optionality (INFERENCE)

Industry Context — Financials — Capital Markets

This name sits in the Financials — Capital Markets cluster as a brokerage & capital markets name. client assets + trading / IB activity + net interest on cash sweep. Its scenarios are not guessed in isolation — they inherit a single, shared view of the cluster's driver cycle, so the names that depend on the same event are mutually consistent.

Value chain: EVR (brokerage & capital markets) · SF (brokerage & capital markets) · JEF (brokerage & capital markets) · HLI (brokerage & capital markets)

Mapping note: name-level 'Structural — Zero-Commission / Rate / Competition Reset' (20%) + 'Market-Activity Recession' (17%) map to cluster Market-Activity Recession / Rate Reset (37%); name-level 'Growth — Asset Gathering / Rate Tailwind' (20%) + 'Bull — Re-Rate' (8%) map to cluster Upside — Asset Gathering / Rate Tailwind (28%) — the cluster row is the SUM of the mapped scenario probabilities, not a different estimate.

On the cluster's key downside — Market-Activity Recession / Rate Reset — this name implies 37% vs the cluster house view of 37% (in line with the house). The cluster's full cross-stock reconciliation governs that the names which ride the same capex cycle assign it comparable odds.

Structure: Shared State — The Financials — Capital Markets cycle is the shared macro driver. Driver — client assets + trading/IB activity + net interest on cash sweep. Dispersion — Members differ by cyclicality (quality compounders vs deep cyclicals).

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Balance-sheet data as of 2025-12-31 (Alpha Vantage).

Capital Allocation

Free-Cash-Flow Quality

Accounting quality: SBC 1% of revenue; cash conversion (OCF/NI) 212% — cash-backed.

Earnings-Call Disconfirmation & Sentiment

Derived signals from the MCH market-data store (Alpha Vantage transcripts + news). Quantitative tone only — a disconfirmation flag, not a substitute for reading the call.

Management vs analyst tone (2026Q1): management +0.52 vs analyst floor +0.00 → delta +0.52 (n=23 mgmt / 16 Q&A; 74th pctile across the S&P book, z +0.7).

Flag: TYPICAL — management-vs-analyst tone within the normal cross-sectional range.

News (last 365d, 203 articles): avg ticker sentiment +0.22 (bullish 24% / bearish 1%)

Consensus & Market Expectations

_Consensus figures: Alpha Vantage sell-side aggregates. Where the house view sits materially above or below the street, the divergence is itself a datum — see the thesis.

Forecast Track Record

• EPS surprise: beat 88% of the last 8 quarters; average surprise +31.6%.
• Prior-forecast backtest (18 snapshots, 2026-07-21→2026-09-03): directional hit-rate 39%; mean predicted +8.1% vs realised -3.9%. Disconfirming track record is reported, not suppressed.

Catalyst Timeline

4 catalysts in the next 90 days (of 12 tracked). Importance 1–3; confidence 0–1.

_Sources: extended.catalysts, data/catalysts/.json, data/catalysts/macro.json, AV DIVIDENDS, opex 3rd-Friday calc.

Scenario Macro & Key Risks

Decision Rules (Machine-Checked)

Stance: Hold — 0 bullish / 0 bearish / 0 caution rules triggered of 6 evaluable (0 lacked data).

Machine-checked rules over disclosed inputs. The authored falsification triggers elsewhere in this report are analyst judgment and are NOT evaluated here. The stance is a portfolio-management signal and does not modify the published research rating.

Reasons the Thesis Could Fail (Falsifiable)

Pre-registered signals that would break the thesis — each polices a specific scenario boundary and is checked at every earnings update:

• Organic revenue growth / order backlog < flat-to-negative for two consecutive quarters (2 consecutive prints). Sustained demand rollover breaks the base case toward the recession scenario.
• FY revenue ($B) < 4.7 (next reported fiscal year). (rationale withheld pending re-authoring — frozen figure or verdict)
• Probability-weighted fair value (PWEV) at the next re-run < 295.67 (any scheduled re-run). (rationale withheld pending re-authoring — frozen figure or verdict)

Fact / Inference / Speculation

• FACT: Spot $296; 52-week range $265–$387; engine rating HOLD; house target $333 (+13%). (source: Alpha Vantage 2026-09-08, 9 September 2026)
• INFERENCE: Triangulated FV $327 (+11% vs spot · triangulated FV); the rating tracks the Monte-Carlo + scenario-PWEV core; the cash-flow anchor sits below the multiple-discipline core.
• SPECULATION: At current prices the embedded bet is that the market keeps paying the current multiple through the capex cycle — a regime call the engine cannot verify from fundamentals alone.

Conviction Score

Research Conviction measures the strength and quality of the research setup — input coverage, financial quality, valuation support, process agreement. It is NOT the probability that the recommendation succeeds; the forecast track record section is the evidence on that.

62.4/100 (confidence band 49.6–75.3), 68th percentile of 893 covered names (as of 2026-09-08). Weighted composite under config ros-1.20.0 — every component and its inputs below.

Missing inputs (financial strength) are excluded and the remaining weights renormalised; the confidence band widens accordingly.

Score history: 62.4 → 62.7 → 62.7 → 62.7 → 62.0 → 61.2 → 61.9 → 62.1.

Probability-Weighted Return Profile

Horizon: 1 year — at this horizon CAGR equals total return by definition. Expected values are the probability-weighted sums over the full scenario set below.

The gross expected return is the probability-weighted scenario return (it reconciles to the gross PWEV); the diluted figure applies the SBC share-count charge and matches the published PWEV-based target.

Expected Alpha

Expected return minus the return this name is REQUIRED to deliver for its risk (1-year horizon). Constants are pre-registered (preregistered-static (amendment #2, 2026-07-29); not fitted to MCH outcomes).

A negative expected alpha does not change the rating — it says the expected return does not clear the risk-adjusted hurdle at today's price. Rating mechanics are unchanged by this section.

Probability Cross-Checks

Not authoritative. The scenario probabilities in this report are AUTHORED — a judgement about how the world might go, not a measurement. Nothing below modifies them, the target, the rating or any position size. These checks ask only whether anything outside our own model agrees with us; where it does not, that is information for the reader, not a correction we have quietly applied.

Authored set: 5 scenarios, probabilities summing to 1.0, mean target $332.69.

Factor Exposures

Cross-sectional percentiles over 893 covered names (style scores sector-demeaned; thematic = return-beta to the theme's proxy ETF). 50 = estate median.

Market interaction: correlation vs SPY +0.69, vs QQQ +0.60 (trailing ~1y daily returns).

Options Intelligence

Preferred structure: Long Stock. The selector reads the equity view (direction) and the volatility surface — nothing here re-prices the chain.

• bullish with fairly-priced options — own the stock; a poor-man's covered call is a leveraged alternative
• Direction bullish from the overlay conviction/rating (read-only input).
• IV/RV at the 37th percentile of the cross-section → mid vol bucket. This is the measure that selects the structure above: it ranks how rich this name's implied vol is against its own realised vol, relative to other names.
• Reported alongside and not used to select: this name's own ATM IV sits at the 58th percentile of its own month-end history (decile 6).
• IV term structure is in contango (longer-dated richer, slope +1.9pp) — favour longer-dated ownership (LEAPS) or calendars that are long the cheaper front.
• No live-chain Long Stock was priced for this name — shown as the indicated strategy; size against a freshly pulled chain.

IV term structure (contango, slope +1.9pp): 38-DTE 39% · 101-DTE 40% · 192-DTE 40%

No live-chain Long Stock was priced for this name — shown as the indicated approach; size against a fresh chain.

Alternatives: Call Debit Spread. IV rank shown via the name's own monthly IV history (advisory); structure selected on the cross-sectional IV/RV percentile. Model output for research and education only — not individualised investment advice. Position-sizing and stance figures are mechanical outputs of the disclosed rules and inputs; they do not consider any person's objectives, financial situation, or tax status.

Position Sizing Framework

Model output for research and education only — not individualised investment advice. Position-sizing and stance figures are mechanical outputs of the disclosed rules and inputs; they do not consider any person's objectives, financial situation, or tax status.

Options Overlay

A defined-risk way to express the HOLD equity view. Chain as of 2026-09-08 — end-of-day marks — indicative, not executable quotes.

Market signals — ATM IV 38.6% (moderate regime) · expected move ±9.9% (2026-10-16) · put/call OI 0.41 · ATM Δ 0.49 / Θ -0.21 / ν 0.38. Direction: LONG (implied return +10.7% to triangulated fair value $327.33).

Bull Call Spread (Bullish) — Long 300 C / Short 340 C · 2027-03-19 · net debit $14.7 · max profit $25.30 · breakeven $314.70 · RoR 172.0% · max loss $14.70 · priced from the listed chain (EOD marks)

Defined-cost leverage to the fair-value gap: the debit is the entire downside, in exchange for participation between the strikes — directional exposure at a fraction of the outright call premium. Illustrative — no outcome is implied or guaranteed.

Long Call (LEAPS) (Bullish) — Long 300 C · 2027-03-19 · premium $33.85 · breakeven $333.85 · max loss $33.85 · priced from the listed chain (EOD marks)

Pure defined-risk directional exposure — the premium is the whole downside while the full upside is retained. A capped, known cost as an alternative to owning the shares outright.

Put Spread (income) (Bullish / income) — Short 270 P / Long 250 P · 2026-10-16 · net $3.17 · net entry $266.82 · yield 1.2% · RoR 19.0% · max loss $16.82 · priced from the listed chain (EOD marks)

Gets paid to wait for a lower entry, with the tail capped: the sold put collects premium while the cheaper long wing below it caps the maximum loss at the spread width — a defined-risk alternative to a naked cash-secured put.

Indicative options structures — a defined-risk expression of the equity view, model-and-market illustrated from the last-close chain. NOT personalised advice or an executable quote; premiums, IV and greeks move intraday. Options carry the risk of total loss of premium. Not a registered financial adviser.

Rating Bridge

Rating = HOLD because:

• Probability-weighted scenario value implies +13% vs spot
• Monte Carlo median implies +6% vs spot
• DCF fair value implies +12% vs spot
• Bear case (Structural — Zero-Commission / Rate / Competition Reset) downside is -50% vs spot
• Net: reward/risk of 0.2× is not asymmetric enough for a Buy and not impaired enough for a Sell — hence Hold.

Model Appendix

DCF — line items

FCF is bridged: NOPAT + D&A − Capex − ΔNWC (capex intensity 2% of revenue, weighted from the segments) — not a single conversion fudge.

WACC 9.0% · Σ PV(FCF) $3B + PV(terminal) $10B = EV $13B; + net cash $0.1B → equity $13B ÷ diluted shares $0.04B = $330/share (exit-multiple terminal).

• Gordon terminal at 2.5% → $326/share — a genuinely non-multiple, cash-based cross-check; the exit-multiple and Gordon values bracket the terminal-value risk.
• Incremental ROIC on the forecast capex ≈ 42% vs WACC 9.0% → above WACC — the build is value-creative.

Peer set

Implied prices at the peer medians: EV/Rev → $209 (no P/E-implied price — no forward-EPS basis at the peer step).

Weighted fair-value math

Assumption Register

Sensitivity-ranked drivers (widest fair-value swing first): Op margin ±3pp (98.0); Revenue CAGR ±3pp (79.0); Terminal × ±15% (74.0); WACC ±1pp (27.0); Capex intensity ±15% (13.0).

Inputs, Sources & Confidence

Every load-bearing input, labelled by type and confidence. (reported fact · company guidance · consensus estimate · market data · house estimate · inference.)

Research Provenance

Load-Bearing Assumptions

DCF: WACC 9.0%, terminal multiple 16×, FY+5 revenue $6B. Triangulation leans 47% on DCF, 33% on PWEV, 20% on the Monte Carlo median.