Research Integrity Policy
Every MCH investment conclusion should be capable of being challenged, traced and reproduced: classification, provenance, reproducibility and revisions.
This policy sets out the standards under which MCH Publications research is produced, classified, labelled and revised. It forms part of the MCH Publications policy framework and is one of the three research-governance standards, alongside the Performance & Backtesting Policy and the Conflicts of Interest & Securities Ownership Policy.
Core principle
Every MCH investment conclusion should be capable of being challenged, traced and reproduced.
The classification, governance attributes, reproducibility, labelling and revision rules below give effect to this principle.
Research classification
MCH research distinguishes three kinds of statement, so that a reader can tell which kind of statement supports a conclusion.
FACT — An objectively verifiable claim supported by identifiable evidence or source material.
INFERENCE — An analytical conclusion derived from identified facts, models or assumptions.
SPECULATION — A plausible proposition with material uncertainty or insufficient direct evidence.
Governance attributes for material research
Where appropriate, material research should identify:
- publication timestamp
- information cut-off
- source provenance
- methodology or model version
- material assumptions
- key risks
- probability or scenario framework
- valuation framework
- falsification criteria
- kill switch, where used
- conflicts and holdings
- revision history
Reproducibility
Where commercially and legally possible, MCH should retain enough internal provenance to reproduce material quantitative outputs.
This does not require public disclosure of proprietary code, licensed datasets or confidential intellectual property.
Performance types
Performance outputs must carry one of the following explicit labels:
- Backtest
- Simulated
- Paper
- Live
- Audited actual
Different categories must not be merged into one apparent historical-performance series without clear disclosure. The classification and disclosure rules for performance outputs are set out in the Performance & Backtesting Policy.
Evidence discipline
Where a claim materially drives a conclusion, MCH prefers more than one independent source where practical.
Research revisions
Material historical conclusions must not be silently overwritten. Corrections and amendments to published research are handled under the Research Corrections & Amendments Policy.
Conflicts and holdings
Holdings and conflicts that bear on a publication are disclosed under the Conflicts of Interest & Securities Ownership Policy.
Questions about methodology, data or a specific publication may be sent to research@mchadvisoryservices.com.
- Performance & Backtesting Policy
- Research Corrections & Amendments Policy
- Conflicts of Interest & Securities Ownership Policy
Questions about this policy: research@mchadvisoryservices.com. All policies: MCH Publications legal.